It was the disappointment that really hurt. We always have a great day when we go to Chelsea, partly I imagine because many long-suffering Fulham fans weren’t sure that we’d ever play them on a regular basis again. As usual, there was a noisy following to roar the Whites on – and for a few fleeting first-half minutes – it seemed that we might be able to get something out of the game. Ultimately, a couple of defensive mistakes cost us but we’ll have the memory of a brilliant finish from Erik Nevland to look back on I suppose.
It looked ominous from the first whistle. Chelsea went in front as many people around me were still taking their seats. Zoltan Gera played a hopeless ball forward and a quick exchange of one-touch passes had Chelsea streaming forward. Anelka found Drogba, who hadn’t resorted to rolling around unfortunately, and the Ivorian played a cute little ball that left Hangeland stretching desperately in vain as Anelka converted a great chance with ease. What galled me the most was the fact that we didn’t get close to putting in a tackle throughout the entire move. The sight of Danny Murphy sprinting into his own penalty area in an attempt to shackle Anelka was heartbreaking.
Deflation turned to elation just three minutes later. Murphy, back in his element as a cunning midfield playmaker, unlocked the Chelsea defence with a brilliant ball through the middle. Their back line was caught horribly square – Ashley Cole tried gamely to push up – and Erik Nevland raced onto the through ball. He didn’t have many options and the angle seemed tight but the power of his finish saw his shot burst through Cech and roll into the corner. It wasn’t as picture perfect as his goal at Reading last season but it was just as glorious. The Norweigan was desperate to impress, having finally been given an opportunity to prove what he could do from the start.
Just as Fulham were started to settle and play some football, we conceded another sloppy goal. It stemmed from a throw in down the left that Nevland couldn’t win in the air. The ball broke favourably to Anelka who played Drogba down the right. The Ivorian got a little lucky as his cross missed Anelka but John Pantsil lost his footing as he tried to clear and Florent Malouda, looking revitalised under Guus Hiddink, finished with aplomb at the far post. Ten minutes in and we’d already had three goals. Any thoughts of Fulham shutting up shop at the Bridge were well wide of the mark.
The Whites weren’t finished mind you. Although Chelsea had more of the ball and the play, Fulham had three good chances before the half time whistle. Bobby Zamora headed wide from a decent position after outjumping John Terry, Nevland made another chance for himself on the edge of the box – volleying over the bar after Clint Dempsey’s attempt to chest the ball down saw it blown up in the air. Gera nearly equalised just before the break, too, but his deflected shot flew just over the bar.
Injuries played another big part in the way we largely failed to carry a threat to Chelsea in the second half. Had Terry not nobbled Nevland with a crude challenge in the middle of the first half, the Norweigan might have caused a few more problems for the Blues defence. He might not be the quickest but his intelligence certainly can’t be questioned and he must be the coolest finisher at the club. Worryingly, he looked close to tears when he went off – hopefully, the injury’s nothing more serious than the dead leg the papers have reported this morning.
Chelsea could have further clear by the break too. Lampard saw a shot well blocked by Aaron Hughes and the defence had to be on their guard to soak up a period of Chelsea pressure at the end of the first half. Perhaps with an eye on the second leg against Barcelona, neither Alex or Essien reappeared for the second half but neither of their replacements, Ballack or Ivanovic were cautioned for entering the field of play before being given permission by the fourth official or the referee.
It was immensely frustrating that the crucial third goal came when Kamara, who ran around a lot but was largely ineffective, and Konchesky looked like they might recreate one of the chances they failed to put away at the Bridge. The left back had pushed forward and looked like he might burst onto the ball on the edge of the box and the rebound just wouldn’t fall kindly for Danny Murphy. Chelsea swept up field at pace, Anelka supply a lovely ball for Drogba, who timely his run beautifully and dropped his shoulder to beat Schwarzer before finishing with ease.
Fulham offered precious little after that. Hodgson had it right afterwards when he said the rest of the game was a battle not to be embarassed. Lampard’s fierce free-kick was well tipped over by Schwarzer and Drogba perhaps should have profited from close range after Konchesky committed himself too early against the lively Drogba. Our threat was almost as sporadic as Chelsea’s singing – Zamora looked terribly tentative when he bore down on Cech before his afternoon was brought to a premature end by another injury.
With victories for West Ham, Manchester City and Tottenham, this might well be remembered as the day our European dream died. Sitting in ninth place now on goal difference, reaching seventh is still conceivable but it would require a fine end to the season.
CHELSEA (4-4-2): Cech; Bosingwa, A. Cole, Alex (Ivanovic 45), Terry; Essien (Ballack 45), Lampard, Mikel, Malouda; Droga (Di Santo 84), Anelka. Subs (not used): Hilario, Kalou, Belletti, Mancienne.
GOALS: Anelka (1), Malouda (10), Drogba (53).
FULHAM (4-4-2): Schwarzer; Pantsil, Konchesky, Hughes, Hangeland; Etuhu, Murphy, Gera, Dempsey; Zamora (Dacourt 76), Nevland (Kamara 35). Subs (not used): Zuberbuhler, Stoor, Baird, Smalling, Gray.
BOOKED: Murphy.
GOAL: Nevland (4).
REFEREE: Alan Wiley (Staffordshire).
ATTENDANCE: 41,808.
At the risk of prompting another debate, I thought Pantsil cost us two goals yesterday.
The second goal was a horrible error – and I think Roy was being rather charitable when he said that Pantsil slipped. It seemed to me that it was more of a halfhearted attempt at a clearance, he should have either committed to the middle to get the ball away or stayed on the far post so that Malouda wouldn’t have reached it.
Plenty of people have been commenting on how good Chelsea’s third goal was. Yes, it was good but we were caught horribly up the pitch and, with no one closing down Anelka, Pantsil completely failed to track Drogba’s run. I’m pretty sure the Pantsil myth won’t have been flattened though.
Would second the notion that Pantsil had a poor game defensively, but that’s probably only the second time (after West Ham away) that you could say that this season.
In addition, he looked like one of the few who was keen to get forward and provide some width after Chelsea’s third goal. Unfair to slate him for that goal I think – as much as I dislike him, it was a brilliant run by Drogba. I presume we’ll be working hard on our defensive shape in training this week.
With all the injuries to the front line, wouldn’t this be a good time to give Barnes a good run in the 1st team? Any news on his fitness?
Colin – The club hope that Barnes will be ready to begin full training again this week. It may be a bit soon for him to start against the Villa. He’s more of a wide player (ocassionally central midfield) than a conventional striker though. Nevland should be fit for the weekend so it could well be him and Kamara up front again.
The ‘Pantsil myth’ referred to above rather riles me a bit. The way I see it the fans are warming to a character rather than a great player. They like his atttitude and the fact that he gives his all. The fact that he’s had a far better season then anyone’s expected makes it even better.
Fulham fans have a habit of turning players who aren’t all that great into heroes. I’ll give two examples. Everyone still loves Moritz Volz even though, in the cold light of day, he probably wasn’t good enough to be a regular Premiership right back. And, from a few years ago, there’s Gus Uhlenbeek. Great guy, lots of fun to watch but very hit and miss. Come to think of it all of them are right backs.
Pantsil’s done really well this year. He’s entitled to a mistake or two but, other than the really impressionable, I think most of us aren’t unaware of his shortcomings.
That’s a good point about our loveable right backs Toby. Hadn’t thought about it that way. I read somewhere else a suggestion that Stoor should be given a go at RM to offer a bit more security than Gera. Think that would be harsh. But to single out Pantsil when every member of the back four made mistakes is to come down too hard on the man for me.