Watching yesterday’s game at Bournemouth, I thought we had just the one preening narcissist to deal with – more on referee Graham Scott later – but then I read Scott Parker’s post-match comments. It is possible to consider the former Fulham manager as someone with immense potential as a young coach if he learns from the mistakes he made in his first managerial job, but he will also have to stop deluding himself about why the Fulham faithful have taken a dislike to the man who wore the captain’s armband and finished his career as a regular fixture in our midfield.

Parker’s suggestion that his Fulham side and the one that Marco Silva has led to promotion were ‘very similar if not identical seemed to stretch credulity,’ but the Bournemouth boss verged on the preposterous after the final whistle claiming to be deeply hurt by the opprobrium of the visiting support. His actions at the end of a cagey encounter between the division’s two leading sides firmly established the ex-England captain believes the world revolves around him. There he was holding back Silva after the Portuguese coach had been sent from the field – having previously aimed barbs in his direction – and he even inched towards the Fulham fans to applaud them after Dominic Solanke had equalised with the contentious stoppage-time spot-kick.

Parker is a masterful manipulator of the media, which seems to be a pre-requisite in modern management if not in Downing Street these days. He also writes a good line in revisionist history. When he claimed to have taken Fulham over in complete despair, he neglects to mention his own role in backroom upheaval ahead of Fulham’s return to the top flight, when his decision to return to Craven Cottage from Tottenham displaced the popular Stuart Gray. Parker pushed to succeed Slavisa Jokanovic in the run up to the sacking of the Serbian and before the club’s hierarchy disastrously plumped for Claudio Ranieri.

He deserves credit for turning round a losing mentality and guiding the Whites up via the Championship play-offs, but his safety-first approach sucked all the life out of what might have been an enterprising Fulham side. Parker’s pragmatism turned a team that, having recruited the likes of Ivan Cavaleiro, Anthony Knockaert and Bobby Decordova-Reid to supplement Aleksandar Mitrovic, plodded their way to promotion rather than putting their opponents to the sword. It was telling that the early-season romp over Millwall, lauded for Fulham’s scarcely-believable possession statistics, proved to be an anomaly rather than the norm. In what now looks like an ominous foreshadowing of what was to follow, Mitrovic scored 26 goals but hardly looked the fulcrum of a ponderous attack.

Parker still firmly believes that he gave everything to improve Fulham and did a good job. The puff pieces in the media that increased in regularity when the Whites looked like winning their battle against the drop might maintain that pretence, but the evidence to contrary is compelling. A squad comprising Alphonse Areola, Kenny Tete, Joachim Anderson, Tosin Adarabioyo, Andre-Franck Anguissa, Harrison Reed, Ademola Lookman, Fabio Carvalho and Mitrovic should have made a much better fist of staying up but were suffocated by Parker’s pre-occupation with keeping things tight. It suits Parker to suggest that he left Fulham in a good place, but the opposite is the only accurate way to assess the shambles that Silva inherited last summer.

Fulham were relegated having scored just nine home league goals and the fewest points at home of any club in Premier League history. Parker had ostracised a number of key players, with the veteran Tim Ream – rarely a man to offer public words of condemnation – demoted to the sidelines alongside Mitrovic, who was excluded in favour of not just Josh Maja but the woeful finishing of Ivan Cavaleiro, and Joe Bryan. Morale was low enough after Fulham folded from a position of strength built by two wins on Merseyside, but Parker’s flirtation with Bournemouth – well known in football circles for much of last season – not only impacted upon the denouement of an underwhelming season but their preparations for another Championship campaign.

The pretty straight sort of guy angled for a pay-off whilst making eyes at his future employers. He took virtually the entire Fulham first team coaching set-up to the south coast after trying to encourage Fulham to sell the likes of Mitrovic and Tom Cairney in favour of another ruinous rebuild. It was a wholly unedifying episode, but Parker’s departure ultimately benefited the Whites immeasurably. Whilst his sterile and limited football has been transported to Dorset, Fulham have become an adventurous outfit under Silva and shouldn’t be unduly perturbed by yesterday’s stoppage time setback. It is difficult to dislike Bournemouth’s knowledgeable, generous and pleasant fan base but Parker’s presence in the Dean Court dugout means Fulham fans will always have a reason to. We’ll have to live with the fashionista’s enduring pain.

Parker even sought to question whether the goal-line technology was at fault for Mitrovic’s opener yesterday, which was audacious even for a peddler of alternative facts. Bournemouth ultimately profited from Graham Scott’s strange officiating – however stupid Harry Wilson was to give the referee a decision to make right at the death, and I wonder if he might have quibbled with that had it occurred in the other penalty area. The ex-Old Abingdon official’s presence on the PGMOL select group list, branded a mistake by the legendary Keith Hackett, is a curiosity given that he was set to be demoted at the end of a poor first season and was only saved by a personal appeal. Scott, of course, is another man who thinks we have all paid to watch him: as demonstrated by the way he ruined what might have been an intriguing contest by chucking cards around like confetti.