When an interim coach in charge of first-team affairs is losing fixtures, it’s understandably a lot easier to walk away than if results pick up, as does the atmosphere and performances around the football club. Even a club the size of Manchester United saw that impact as something that they could not reject after ‘loaned’ Ole Gunnar Solksjaer won over the board and was rewarded with the permanent position after winning losing just once in his first 13 fixtures and pushing what looked to be a lost season into Champions League contention. Following the permanent appointment of the Norwegian, United’s form has swung back the other and as I type, the Red Devils have lost five of their last seven matches (including exiting the Champions League).
So what relevance does this have to Fulham? Well, Scott Parker too was put in charge of first-team affairs on a basis of seeing it out to the end of the season for the club to reassess their future. Whilst Ole’s appointment sparked an immediate turn of dominant form, Fulham’s fixture list and quality of personnel saw it unlikely for Fulham to go on a similar run but other than a thoroughly disappointing display at Watford which confirmed relegation, Fulham have looked happier, more competitive and stronger. With a 2-0 home win against Everton and a 1-0 at Bournemouth, Scott Parker’s Fulham has now doubled their clean sheet tally and ensured that Parker will finish the season with more Premier League points than Slavisa Jokanovic, that man that took the Whites to the ‘promised land.’
One could also compare the Parker project to Darren Moore’s appointment at West Bromwich Albion the previous year. Moore was given the reigns after Tony Pulis and Alan Pardew were both let go in between a caretaker spell for Gary Megson. West Bromwich Albion was all but relegated with a 10 point gap and six matches. Wins over Manchester United and Tottenham including a point against Liverpool had West Brom hoping to keep their Premier League status alive until the final day but a Southampton win over Swansea saw the Baggies relegated whilst watching at home. Darren Moore was rewarded with the permanent job and took West Brom into a Championship campaign hoping for an immediate bounce back. Supported with the signings of Sam Johnstone and Kyle Bartley on permanent deals and the loan of Dwight Gayle (among others), Moore had the Baggies in the promotion chase all season but two losses against promotion rivals Sheffield United and Leeds United followed by a draw at home to the now relegated Ipswich Town saw Darren Moore bizarrely (from an outside perspective at least) sacked though it seems that West Bromwich Albion’s finances may not quite enjoy another year in the Championship, the lottery of the playoffs on the face of it was not good enough.
Back to Fulham, the players are openly behind Scott Parker, a good chunk of the squad were teammates of the former club captain but I think you may struggle to find a situation where the players were against the interim coach, especially following a horrible appointment of dinosaur Claudio. It’s hard not to harp back a few years and think of Kit Symons’ appointment following Felix Magath’s reign where the stands were desperate for the then under 23 coach to the first team role on a permanent basis following a strong run of form and very different feeling around the club. That experiment may be one that will worry the Khan’s, the Welshman lasted a little over a year and although through the recruitment of Mike Rigg and Kit Symons improved the playing staff slightly (in came Ryan Fredericks, Tim Ream and Tom Cairney) as well as overseeing the development of Marcus Bettinelli and Moussa Dembele, Fulham remained a team around the bottom of the division.
It would be very difficult to argue against the permanent appointment of Scott Parker being a gamble. The 2019/20 season will see Scott Parker enter his third year of professional coaching after a year with Tottenham’s under 18s and this rollercoaster at Fulham. Parker is currently supported by Matt Wells, a young but vastly experienced coach that was brought over from Tottenham where they worked together and also Stuart Gray, part of Jokanovic’s promotion backroom staff who probably should never have been allowed to leave. Gray has volumes of Football League experience, his stint in charge of Sheffield Wednesday saw them reach their highest finish in the Championship for six years as well as equal their single-season clean sheet record. Where Parker may lack experience on the training pitch, he’s being supported hugely in his backroom staff that he has been allowed to build up to this point.
Since Scott Parker has been placed in charge, we’ve some of the best individual performances from a few players this season. Franck Anguissa has strung together some impressive displays, Sergio Rico at Bournemouth made some impressive saves to ensure he kept a clean sheet and Ryan Sessegnon, playing off of the right, gave Nathan Ake nightmares. Even without Alfie Mawson, the eleven is playing more like a team making the back four feel as solid as it has all season. These last two victories have both been at 0-0 going into half time with an increase in performance once the sides came back out, that really displays a tactical nous and motivational aspect to the job that perhaps isn’t clear to the eye.
The talk of a Steve Clarke won’t go away and I do understand why the Khan’s would want to go in that direction given their previous experience with the aforementioned emotional Kit Symons experiment. I think the last two weeks have shown that Scott Parker can set up and motivate a team in a situation where the players have nothing to play for but pride. If supported with key players staying and adding to the squad, I do believe that Scott and his backroom staff can push for promotion. It is easy to say this when I am not under the pressure of every decision being analysed and criticised, even more so after a disastrous season.
Given that we own a good championship defence and midfield, a good team should be possible with the money from sales ( I suspect Seri, Mitro and Sess who can bring in £100m plus).
Parker as manager could help keep the youth players we need to develop. While the Symons experience was bad, I think we should try Parker – I can’t see anyone available who is a guaranteed premiership manager.
I agree with you, Scott has done everything asked of him and seems to have the squad gelling. However I have heard rumours that the Kahn’s are making a beeline for Rafa Benitez if this is true then you cant turn down a manager of his quality. Can you?
I think Parker is Khans choice because he will do what is told. Its apparent he still adopts the line of freezing out our best youth player in years and our only 23 who has consistently performed..Matt O’Riley. Until I see him given a chance rather than the talented but soon to leave Elliot, the grubby underbelly of Fulham will still remain..I spoke with one first team player who said most first team players are amazed he isnt with them .. and one rates him higher than Ryan..so I end to think there is something more sinister
None of the names being banded about like Steve Clarke and Neil Lennon who have both failed in the English leagues all seem poor choices. Hopefully Scott Parker will play some of the younger players in the last few games. Let’s see how he does in those matches. If Tony Khan does not let whoever is going to Manager have any input in transfer dealings then the Managers hand will be tied.
Hopefully we can keep hold of Mitro and Cairney going into next year, looking likely that Sess will leave, But with the clauses in most players contracts of reduced wages if we get relegated we can certainly afford to keep hold of most of the team, hopefully Mawson comes back as strong as he was before getting injured again!
I am no Scott Parker fan but I thought the article was very reasoned and gave a reasonable analysis of why it might be the best choice available.
Most of the really capable managers apart from the foreign coaches who seem to accept the players they are given would knock back having their reputatation linked to Fulhams player recruitment. I am afraid of Scott Parker without Stuart Gray who wouldn’t be the worst choice without Parker.
Nothing like the fear I have for wasting the Khans hard earned on a Portugese coach to emulate Wolves/Watfords our record on Players like Ruis and Fonte still give me nightmares and with our recruitment would probably end up with the same outcome.
I feel like we have seen this story played out before with the Kit story last time around so my inclination is to go for someone with Championship promotion experience BUT I categorically don’t want Lennon or Clarke anywhere near the club as they are no better than Allardyce. We should set our sights higher than either of them.
We are obviously not a huge club but we should be looking at someone like David Wagner or possibly offering Slav a return to the club. Hell, we could give Wenger a call to see if he fancies a go. If we can’t attract someone of a decent calibre though then we absolutely should stick with Scott & develop him in the way Derby are with Lampard.
Excellent article. It is a conundrum, but for me Parker deserves the chance to begin a Championship campaign.
I agree David Wagner would be a good choice and I am sitting on the fence about scott Parker as there care pro and cons about him getting the job. I think there might be a slight chance of Sess and Mitro staying if he is the manager. Clarke and Lennon are a definite NO NO.
Tony Khan needs to completely revise his transfer policy and stop getting in second rate foreign mercenaries who are only in for the money.It is blatantly obvious all season we need at least one decent right back and another full back who could play on either flank. Also a centre back with a bit of pace who can deal with high crossed balls. alo a goalkeeper who can catch the ball from corner and aerial bombardments, someone like good old Mark Swartzer.Also another centre as we have no one to cover for Mitro. Dad is willing to spend the money and his son does not know how to spend it.