http://hammyend.com/index.php/2009/05/the-chelsea-post-mortem/ Fri, 18 May 2012 00:50:13 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 http://hammyend.com/index.php/2009/05/the-chelsea-post-mortem/comment-page-1/#comment-3551 vincent vega Mon, 04 May 2009 20:31:37 +0000 http://hammyend.com/?p=1725#comment-3551 I agree with much of what this article is saying however as a chelsea supporter there are a couple of creaces i would like to iron out. What you say about malouda is dead on however since hiddink came in maluoda has been in amazing form, the best he has been in since he left lyon and the first minute goal was deserved but in this situation credit must go to the chelsea front 3 rather than take anything away from the fulham drffence as even after watching the replay several times your deffence didnt do anything wrong, it was just one of those situations where it was undefendable, even the best defenders on the planet would of struggled to stop that attack and apart from anything it was under 50 seconds and realisticslly no one is expecting a goal that early no matter who is playing also mikel, he is a vastly under rated player and deserves much more credit than he gets, his passing is of the top quality along with everything else needed to make a well rounded midfielder maybe take out a few dodgy challenges but apart from he is amazing, in chelsea he plays out of position as a holding midfielder when he was bought as a playmaker and everytime he goes forward he shines allbeit shy of a goal or to but that is down to his position and the fact he does no go in to the box to compete at set pieces. As for the game over all? no because of the result i thought it was an exciting open game untill chelsea got the third goal untill the i was biting my nails as both defences werr well below par. I agree with much of what this article is saying however as a chelsea supporter there are a couple of creaces i would like to iron out. What you say about malouda is dead on however since hiddink came in maluoda has been in amazing form, the best he has been in since he left lyon and the first minute goal was deserved but in this situation credit must go to the chelsea front 3 rather than take anything away from the fulham drffence as even after watching the replay several times your deffence didnt do anything wrong, it was just one of those situations where it was undefendable, even the best defenders on the planet would of struggled to stop that attack and apart from anything it was under 50 seconds and realisticslly no one is expecting a goal that early no matter who is playing also mikel, he is a vastly under rated player and deserves much more credit than he gets, his passing is of the top quality along with everything else needed to make a well rounded midfielder maybe take out a few dodgy challenges but apart from he is amazing, in chelsea he plays out of position as a holding midfielder when he was bought as a playmaker and everytime he goes forward he shines allbeit shy of a goal or to but that is down to his position and the fact he does no go in to the box to compete at set pieces. As for the game over all? no because of the result i thought it was an exciting open game untill chelsea got the third goal untill the i was biting my nails as both defences werr well below par.

]]>